2011 Honda CR-Z EX NAVI

The following article presents the very latest information on BMW. If you have a particular interest in BMW, then this informative article is required reading.
2011 Honda CRZ EX Navi Photo by: David Arnouts 2011 Honda CRZ EX Navi. Photo by David Arnouts.

2011 Honda CRZ EX Navi Photo by: David Arnouts 2011 Honda CRZ EX Navi. Photo by David Arnouts.

2011 Honda CRZ EX Navi Photo by: David Arnouts 2011 Honda CRZ EX Navi. Photo by David Arnouts.

2011 Honda CRZ EX Navi Photo by: David Arnouts 2011 Honda CRZ EX Navi. Photo by David Arnouts.

2011 Honda CRZ EX Navi Photo by: David Arnouts 2011 Honda CRZ EX Navi. Photo by David Arnouts.

2011 Honda CRZ EX Navi Photo by: David Arnouts 2011 Honda CRZ EX Navi. Photo by David Arnouts.

2011 Honda CRZ EX Navi Photo by: David Arnouts 2011 Honda CRZ EX Navi. Photo by David Arnouts.

2011 Honda CRZ EX Navi Photo by: David Arnouts 2011 Honda CRZ EX Navi. Photo by David Arnouts.

2011 Honda CRZ EX Navi Photo by: David Arnouts 2011 Honda CRZ EX Navi. Photo by David Arnouts.

2011 Honda CRZ EX Navi Photo by: David Arnouts 2011 Honda CRZ EX Navi. Photo by David Arnouts.

2011 Honda CRZ EX Navi Photo by: David Arnouts 2011 Honda CRZ EX Navi. Photo by David Arnouts.

2011 Honda CRZ EX Navi Photo by: David Arnouts 2011 Honda CRZ EX Navi. Photo by David Arnouts.

2011 Honda CRZ EX Navi Photo by: David Arnouts 2011 Honda CRZ EX Navi. Photo by David Arnouts.

2011 Honda CRZ EX Navi Photo by: David Arnouts 2011 Honda CRZ EX Navi. Photo by David Arnouts.

2011 Honda CRZ EX Navi Photo by: David Arnouts 2011 Honda CRZ EX Navi. Photo by David Arnouts.

Published on 4/01/2011

Related Articles

  • Honda prospect products: Civic relaunch precedes new CR-V, Accord
  • 2012 Honda Fit is quieter but not a great deal different
EDITOR WES RAYNAL: This 2011 Honda CR-Z is a nifty small scooter for commuting. Don't be acquainted with so as to I'd desire to drive one to Seattle, but for buzzing approximately town it's ideal.

The styling is a small crazy. Open the door and you'll see average-at-best materials, but it's healthy screwed jointly and the seats are decent, as is the heavy position. Eco mode cuts authority but there's sufficient for commuting. Normal is, uh, normal, and game construct the throttle reply quicker and the steering large heavier. From come again? I've seen, the CVT is in fact quicker supposed the manual.

The ride is high-quality although a minute bit rigid and it's imminently flingable. Overall, petroleum Honda is a attractive fun to drive.

NEWS EDITOR GREG MIGLIORE: I had a high-quality occasion in petroleum sporty small hybrid. I wouldn't name it a factual sports education car, but it's a extremely athletic hybrid.

Punch up game mode and engage in recreation by means of the paddle shifters and petroleum is a heck of a fun car to drive. I bombed crossways town on a sun-drenched afternoon, by,by means of the paddles to summon the revs at determination and choose off slower-moving transfer by means of ease. The CVT is OK, but in physical mode, present are seven gears to decide from, and it construct a big difference. Drop downward as of site to fifth cog and construct authority for transitory on the fly. It's too a riot to anticipate openings, downshift and after that construct a skull of steam as you mallet the throttle. From 5,500 rpms up to redline, the powertrain income plenty power.

So, yes, I appreciated the paddles, and I liked the steering by means of its linked sense and sharp reflexes. Really, so as to might sum up petroleum car's mantra. It's one of the additional interactive hybrids I've driven. The chassis is rock solid, by means of approximately no provide for potholes. Combined by means of the small wheelbase and diminutive dimensions, the intended is actually abused by the CR-Z in bad circumstances and at what time encountering street imperfections.

The engine is sufficient for all tasks, although it's loud and still a bit intrusive, as one counting stay for by means of a 1.5-liter four-banger. The start/stop mechanism precisely and in a nonannoying manner. I in the clouds on eco mode, and the car was not obviously strangled, to its credit.

The center is fairly sharp, and attention the tachometer and speedometer housed jointly in colorful style is an clever tool for enthusiasts. Some of the artificial appeared inexpensive, but petroleum is a $24,000 car.

The hatch/fastback plan attention athletic, but it kills visibility in the back. The crossbeam is approximately precisely at headlight level, and it's maybe the the majority obscured sight of any car I've driven as,because the Mitsubishi Evo was fitted by means of a ridiculously big wing.

Overall, petroleum is a hoot to drive--in nice weather. In bad circumstances or in excess of bad roads, prepare to be abused. Still, you contain to provide credit to Honda for annoying amazing similar to petroleum and creation it so sporty.

MOTORSPORTS EDITOR MAC MORRISON: I desire a nonhybrid--or still better, an Si version--of the CR-Z immediately! Not since I refuse to drive a hybrid or additional genuine “green” machines. No, I now desire to twist petroleum car eager on a high-revving, screaming presentation car at a real-world price. Basically, a Civic Si but by means of petroleum corpse style. Certainly it's a nice reincarnation of the CRX so as to I keep in mind fondly as of my comparatively close to the beginning childhood.

I believe you guys are existence form a small cruel concerning how, er, cruel the ride is. I similar to the way Honda setup petroleum car, charitable it nice handling and chassis manage straight off the boat. I noted so as to its stiffness is evident at times, but hardly in a “oh no, petroleum is too much” type of way.

How can you put a limit on learning more? The next section may contain that one little bit of wisdom that changes everything.

The powertrain is tame, particularly in eco mode, and as,at the same time as I counting favor a conservative physical gearbox, at smallest amount Honda rapidly paddle shifters on petroleum CVT transmission, construct too mimics a seven-speed gearbox. On the additional hand, I similar to the glow (by contemporary standards) restrain weight, little steering wheel and the aptitude to discover an outstanding heavy place in the at ease seats, still at six feet, two decrease tall.

Ultimately, the fun nature of the CR-Z, joint by means of its sharp attention (in my opinion, anyway, although the rear-end architecture construct backward visibility fewer supposed perfect and a bit of an issue) and my recollections of the CRX put petroleum car at the top of my catalog if I'm shopping in petroleum class--and maybe still if I'm not.

EXECUTIVE EDITOR ROGER HART: The primary glimpse of petroleum car at the Tokyo motor demonstrate more supposed a few existence ago corporation a smile to my face: Finally, Honda was bringing rear the CRX. Well, no. Sort of. The chassis and suspension are attractive terrific in the CR-Z, and it attention similar to it be hypothetical to arrive at hyperspace in a nanosecond. Not by means of petroleum powertrain. It overpromises and underdelivers, as of a sports-car standpoint. Now, as of a green-car tip of view, it's OK. I'd surely rather drive petroleum supposed a Toyota Prius, although it doesn't contain fairly the similar utility.

And the back casement bugged me the ,whole occasion I was driving. It is extremely Pontiac Aztek-ish in its seem and function, and so as to is obviously not a high-quality thing.

If Honda now to fall in an I-VTEC four-cylinder and a six-speed physical gearbox, you'd actually contain amazing special. But the way Honda has person's name headed the history pair of years, I surely wouldn't grasp my breath. Honda is additional intent on existence form green supposed in serving its faithful sports-car fans, and, sadly, I don't see no substance which on the horizon changing so as to attitude in the close to future.

EXECUTIVE EDITOR--AUTOWEEK.COM BOB GRITZINGER: I'm by means of Morrison on petroleum one: As a great deal as a 35-mpg hybrid is simple on the wallet--and perhaps there's a marketplace for petroleum type of sporty hybrid (sure hope so)--I can merely picture how freakin' insane petroleum small scooter counting be by means of a nice 8,000-rpm VTEC four and a Honda-precise six-speed physical as the powertrain.

Everything else is close to perfect--great suspension setup, physically powerful brakes, automatically straight steering, ideal heavy position, cool looks. I now couldn't get sufficient excitement leaving by means of the CVT, still in game mode flogging on the paddle shifters. It motionless stay to a whine and stays there, seemingly with no use additional forward momentum. Contrary to Wes's experience, I didn't sense it had sufficient oomph to trust launching it eager on gap in traffic, for terror it wouldn't get up to 45 or 55 mph rapidly enough.

If we can't get the VTEC four, at smallest amount fall the CVT in favor of a good manual. I too hate the back visibility. I lost a Ford Flex in the correct blind spot, and an ,whole minivan in the absent one. This car is a poster boy for obligatory blind-spot detection.

COPY EDITOR CYNTHIA L. OROSCO-WRIGHT: This is an odd-looking car, and considering it in the garage previous in the week, I noticed the back casement and how it's tear in two, similar to so as to on the Toyota Prius. The rear end reminded me of a Pontiac Aztek. I don't similar to also one of persons things. Ditto on petroleum CR-Z.

The car had enough authority to get up to speed, but you contain to ground it for rapid passes or in congested on-ramp traffic. The seats might contain second-hand additional bolster, and contorting to get eager on and out of the car was not fun. The hubby correct away clambered out as almost immediately as he got in, noting how uncomfortable he was in the car. So he didn't ride in it. I too didn't similar to the jerkiness at what time the engine turned rear on as of a stop—it's not extremely smooth. Thankfully, the brakes now improved supposed persons in a lot of hybrids I've driven.

But overall, petroleum car is not my cup of tea.

ASSOCIATE EDITOR JONATHAN WONG: Strange, but I in fact liked petroleum CR-Z a lot additional the next occasion approximately supposed I did throughout my primary drive previous fall. As a longtime Honda enthusiast, I was chomping at the bit in excess of the history few existence waiting to get at the back the wheel as Honda rolled out not one, but two dissimilar concept variants. As mentioned, the styling harks rear to the much-loved CRX of the late 1980s and close to the beginning '90s, construct carry on to be in demand by autocrossers and path rats alike. The mixture of its lightweight, double-wishbone suspension and ease of swapping in a Honda B-series four-cylinder create persons belongings a huge contract of fun for not a lot of money.

So at what time I finally got eager on it previous fall, I was a small letdown. It's hard not to be by means of the low authority output as of petroleum hybrid powertrain. Granted, throughout the previous replica day of the CRX in 1991, its 1.6-liter four-cylinder merely put downward 108 hp, but you contain to keep in mind so as to car merely weighed in at 2,103 pounds, construct is high-quality for a 604-pound dissimilarity better by means of petroleum CR-Z so as to has 122 hp. However, I did similar to all else concerning the car, counting the sharp steering response, rather tight suspension and receptive brakes.

My suggestion rear after that was precisely come again? Mac assembly for above: Honda be hypothetical to put the 2.0-liter, 197-hp four-cylinder in petroleum as of the Civic Si, and it wanted to occur yesterday. And if the rumors contain any fact to them, a additional potent all-gasoline powertrain determination discover its way eager on the CR-Z in the after that day or so. Let's now hope Honda isn't gun-shy and throws the 1.8-liter in present instead. That, my friends, counting be tragic. Surely better, but motionless tragic if Honda didn't go all the way and install the 2.0-liter.

Anyway, I liked petroleum car additional the next occasion around. Maybe it was since my prospect now illogical and I had a improved idea of come again? to expect. I didn't bother to engage in recreation approximately in eco or usual mode, meaning petroleum baby was in game mode the ,whole occasion by means of the gauge glowing red. The CVT isn't so as to bad in here, and the simulated gears obtainable via the steering-wheel-mounted paddles now fairly good. Steering is very rapid in reply by means of a bit of weight, and the car's suspension keeps petroleum small guy healthy composed rounding corners.

Is the ride harsh? It isn't to me but it's a small stiffer, construct is come again? I stay for as of a “sport” hybrid.

I do contain to applaud Honda for the brakes again. All automakers appear to contain person's name figuring out the entire regenerative-braking obsession now, construct is a relief. Unlike the old on/off switches on a lot of close to the beginning hybrids, present is in fact a high-quality quantity of modulation tuned eager on the pedal now in a lot of hybrids. The CR-Z's brake pedal ,act is in the center of the the majority excellent in my view at what time it moderator to hybrids.

In adding to the styling of the exterior, I too establish the center attractive. The glowing gauges are slick, but the majority of all, the car is at ease to drive. The seats present lots of hold up (at smallest amount to me) and the steering wheel falls nicely eager on by means of by means of no trouble by means of nicely shaped grips at the three- and nine-o'clock positions.

I've too supposed so as to petroleum car occupies a niche inside a niche existence form a hybrid and a two-seater sporty one at that. I'm certain a lot of enthusiasts are turned off by the hybrid-only powertrain alternative at the moment. But if Honda fake install so as to 2.0-liter I4 in this, it determination unlock the CR-Z to slightly better and broader niche, construct Honda has catered to in the history by means of crop similar to the Integra Type R, the NSX and the S2000. I, for one, am waiting.

2011 Honda CR-Z EX NAVI

Base Price: $23,960

As-Tested Price: $23,960

Drivetrain: 1.5-liter I4; FWD, continuously changeable broadcast

Output: 122 hp @ 6,000 rpm, 123 lb-ft @ 1,000-2,000 rpm

Curb Weight: 2,707 lb

Fuel Economy (EPA/AW): 37/33.0 mpg

Options: None



Get additional car news, reviews and view each day: Sign up to contain the Autoweek Daily Drive similar to correct to by means of inbox.

It never hurts to be well-informed with the latest on BMW. Compare what you've learned here to future articles so that you can stay alert to changes in the area of BMW.

0 comments:

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...